An Alternative to Litigation: “Part 2, The Basics of Online Negotiation/Mediation: Creating Value Through COVID-19” By Stanley Zamor

“Thank you for allowing me to be your mediator. If you can clearly see/hear me, please give the thumbs up signal… Thank you. You are all not muted and I will do my best to make this feel comfortable and familiar. Thumbs up if you have participated in mediation and/or negotiations using an online platform. Good. Well mediation is a process and technology allows for more flexibility… I am a third party impartial neutral without the authority to impose a decision/solution… All of the rules of confidentiality apply, and all named parties are present correct?… Now, there may come a time where I may need to meet with the parties and their attorneys privately, or the attorneys privately, or even in rare circumstances just both parties together…You are encouraged and empowered to create your own solution that best satisfies your needs today and craft a Mutual Acceptable Agreement… Are there any questions. Let’s begin.”

Part 2 – Creating Mutual Gains and Value

Recently I facilitated an online mediation where both attorneys expressed a frustration with the case and how the matter was being litigated during COVID-19. Everything was an issue, from document production requests/responses, to communicating with multiple revolving attorneys on the case. Nothing was consistent. The above are excerpts from my Mediator’s Orientation Statement (aka the “Opening Statement”) where I addressed the attorneys’ frustrations. IT WORKED!!!! During the process I used the online platform functions to meet separately various times with the attorneys alone and their clients. I was able to create trust in the process, between the attorneys/parties and build perspectives that led to shared mutual goals and a willingness to create an mutually satisfied agreement.

Not enough value is placed on the opening statement (and using an online platform makes is more difficult). Depending on the case & participant specifics, negotiators need to be flexible in their approaches and be prepared to reserve the “Harsh-Tactics” for face-to-face interactions or court!
So, as you negotiate through online platforms think about the following:

1) What do you want out of the process and how will you approach it differently than the usual face-to-face interactions?
2) How have you responded to conflict or the adverse opinions/positions of the other side?
3) How will you participate differently when online?
4) Prepare a brief and concise opening statement that also captures your expectation with online negotiation, AND YOUR LIMITATIONS!
5) Be honest about what you want, and where you are willing to go, save ego for court.

Stanley Zamor is a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit/Family/County Mediator & Primary Trainer and Qualified Arbitrator. Mr. Zamor serves on several federal and state mediation/arbitration rosters and mediates with the ATD (Agree2Disagree) Mediation & Arbitration, PA throughout Florida. As an ADR consultant he regularly lectures on a variety of topics from ethics, cross-cultural issues, diversity, bullying, and Family/Business relationships.

szamor@effectivemediationconsultants.com; www.effectivemediationconsultants.com